Judge every new arXiv paper each morning

01 · Role in the system

What Jev does here

Keyword alerts miss papers that use different words; embedding recommenders quietly drop whatever does not resemble your past reading; LLM digests only afford a pre-filtered top-k. Paper Radar judges everything: each new paper is scored against the interests you wrote in plain English, returning a calibrated probability per interest rather than generated text, so nothing is pre-filtered away before judgment. The author measured a real run - 50 papers in 5 seconds, 932 tokens per paper, $0.0020 - putting all of arXiv at roughly six cents a day with output free, and every run logs its own tokens and cost. A calibrate command estimates your profile before you spend anything, thresholds are tunable and checkable, a public radar runs on weekdays with RSS, and a demo mode works entirely offline without a key.

02 · Control boundary

Where Jev sits

Per-paper batched judgments against a plain-English interest profile; per-interest probabilities with tunable, checkable thresholds; runs log their own cost.

Code owns the loop, permissions, thresholds, validation, and side effects. Jev owns only the bounded judgments described above.

03 · Known limits

What this evidence does not prove

• Judgment quality depends on how well the interests are written; the tool exposes calibration rather than guaranteeing relevance.
• Per-run cost figures are author-measured and logged by the tool, not independently reproduced here.
• Fork-and-go by design: scheduling is yours to wire (cron or Actions), there is no hosted personal instance.

04 · Attribution

Public sources

This is a Community record: the project was published by a third-party community author.

• Eliot5566 ↗Community · github · public · checked 2026-09-24
• Eliot5566 ↗Community · demo · public · checked 2026-09-24