Community · E2 · artifact verified

Interview your AI worldview with typed questions

Doom or Bloom maps where you stand between AI doom and bloom: a dynamic interview where the engine picks the next curated question by where your answers are thinnest, with Jev interpreting answers and scoring candidate follow-ups.

01 · Role in the system

What Jev does here

Every interview starts from one open question - what does AI mean for our future, and why. The engine then supplies structured judgments over shared context: interpreting what your answer expressed, comparing candidate curated follow-ups for which clarifies your worldview with the least repetition and effort, and scoring rubric dimensions that assemble into a worldview profile placed on a spectrum from doom to bloom and incremental to civilizational change. TypeScript owns the routing rules, stopping conditions, calculations, and presentation; questions and result prose are authored, and Jev supplies only the structured judgments. The site includes simulated assessments of well-known AI voices so you can compare your mapped worldview against the field's range, with no account required.

02 · Control boundary

Where Jev sits

Shared interview context to batched typed judgments - interpretation, follow-up comparison, rubric scores - with authored questions and deterministic routing in between.

Code owns the loop, permissions, thresholds, validation, and side effects. Jev owns only the bounded judgments described above.

03 · Known limits

What this evidence does not prove

  • Worldview profiles are judgment-based sketches on an authored rubric, not psychometric measurements.
  • Simulated assessments of public figures are the site's own modeled paraphrases of public positions.
  • Question pool and rubric are authored and fixed; coverage is bounded by their curation.

04 · Attribution

Public sources

This is a Community record: the project was published by a third-party community author.